What startups can learn from the most successful soccer teams

As the Soccer World Cup tournament in South Africa is down to 4 remaining teams (Spain, Uruguay, the Netherlands and my native Germany) it is interesting to analyze why these teams did so well and other (much more favorited or traditionally strong) teams likes Argentina, Brazil, Italy and France did not. As I see it, it comes down to two main factors:

  • Talent over experience: experience is important especially in critical situations like a short tournament but in the end talent trumps experience. Germany sent the youngest national squad to South Africa since 1934 with an average age of only 25 but these young players have not only an incredible talent but also a bigger hunger to win and an amazing speed and energy that lets them out-hassle older teams. On the contrary, both Italy and France sent teams with a majority of players that participated in the 2006 final and were clearly some of the most experienced players in the whole tournament but still exited after the group phase with not a single win. But it is also important to note that the German team is not only made up of youngsters but also has a few really experienced players that provide the necessary leadership for the team.
  • Coherent vision of a team over reliance on a star performance: all 4 teams succeeded without relying on a star player (actually almost all star players like Kaka, Rooney, Messi, Ronaldo or Ribery disappointed at this tournament) but by developing a coherent system of play where the team was the star and not an individual. By getting everybody to help out on the field wherever help was needed, involving every team member in the play independent of popularity off the field and always following the game plan that the coach designed the result was much more powerful than an agglomeration of talented individuals.

So what can startups learn from all of this? I think that both points are also some of the most important success factors for startups. Always hire for talent over experience as the young, smart, hungry team member will very quickly produce more for your company than the seasoned employee that has worked in a similar position for the past 10 years (but make sure that enough seasoned leadership is in place to guide the younger team members). And always focus on the team and a coherent vision that they can follow instead of relying on a few super-stars that might do incredible things once in w while but most often stand in the way of building a great company in the long run.

Looking forward to the final 4 games – and you might guess which team I am cheering for…

  • Danny Robinson

    Agree with your post. It's almost as if you're saying that experience gets in the way of talent, since the two are not mutually exclusive. There are obviously a lot of experienced people who are also talented, but do they still have the same hunger? There something to be said about the thrill and passion you put into something that you're doing for the very first time.

    See my post about something similar here: http://blog.bootuplabs.com/2010/04/08/passion-v…

  • http://twitter.com/AminPali Amin Palizban

    i agree as well. this trend is taking place in many industry sectors. I'm wondering what will happen to the aging workforce? will the economy be affected?

  • http://twitter.com/kradage Kalle Radage

    When I think of “experienced” entrepreneurs, I think of people who have built successful businesses, led great teams, and released amazing products. I don't necessarily think of age. However, I agree that it all starts with talent.

  • bwertz

    Agreed – as I said you need a good mix of experienced leadership and young, smart, energetic doers

  • bwertz

    I think the answer is life-long learning – everybody needs to put him-/herself into a position of adapting to new environments throughout your whole working career. If you stall in your development and lose your flexibility, it might be tough to advance in your job. This is definitely a hard transition for a lot of people bu something that has started a long time ago in many industries as you noted yourself.

  • http://twitter.com/kpooya Pooya Kazerouni

    Cool post Boris. With talent you could initially advance (maybe really fast) but you would never win the cup unless you have the experienced leadership and management. So, I guess the talent's more important at the beginning and the more a company grows , the more important the value of steering the ship would become.

  • Pieter Dorsman

    Boris – The Dutch have had on many tournaments the best team in terms of individual talent (Cruyff, Gullit, Van Basten, Bergkamp etc.) but they never won at a World Cup. In fact they managed to always screw up just before the finish line.

    It is interesting to read and understand why the Dutch are doing so well this year. It boils down to: (1) the team operates as a team and individual ‘diva’ behavior (as opposed to past performances) is practically non-existent. This is a function of how the coach manages his team but also of the individual players involved; (2) the team really believes this time, not the arrogance of ‘we can do it’, no, a deep sense that effort, commitment and focus will pay off.

    No matter how talented you are, please leave your ego at home is the message here I think. Now, let’s see if they can make it to finish line on Sunday!

  • bwertz

    Good luck for the Dutch on Sunday!